<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>SPACE ECONOMY &amp; RURAL DEVELOPMENT</title>
<title_fa>اقتصاد فضا و توسعه روستایی</title_fa>
<short_title>serd</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2322-2131</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2588-476X</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.66224/serd</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>4444</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1394</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2016</year>
	<month>2</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>4</volume>
<number>14</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>تحلیل فضایی مزیت نسبی گروه‌های عمده شغلی جمعیت روستایی ایران</title_fa>
	<title>Spatial analysis of comparative advantage of major occupational groups of rural population in Iran</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;p dir=&quot;RTL&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;در راستای تحقق اهداف برنامه&amp;shy;های توسعه کشور، هماهنگ نمودن اهداف ملی با واقعیت&amp;shy;های منطقه&amp;shy;ای امری اجتناب&amp;shy;ناپذیر است. بر همین اساس، تخصیص منابع باید براساس توانمندی&amp;shy;ها و مزیت&amp;shy;های نسبی مناطق صورت پذیرد. از طرفی، تدوین برنامه توسعه مناطق براساس ظرفیت&amp;shy;های بالقوه و بالفعل در بخش&amp;shy;های مختلف اقتصادی امری بی&amp;shy;بدیل است، از آنجا که فعالیت&amp;shy;های اقتصادی، به طور خاص و منابع و امکانات به طور عام، از لحاظ توزیع فضایی از درجه تمرکز نامطلوبی برخوردار است، هر منطقه متناسب با ویژگی&amp;shy;های خاص خود، نیازمند برنامه&amp;shy;های ویژه&amp;shy;ای است که لازمه هرگونه اقدامی در این زمینه، شناسایی وضعیت گذشته و موجود مناطق مختلف براساس روش&amp;shy;های علمی مناسب است.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;مطالعه حاضر از نوع مطالعات کاربردی بوده که به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی نگاشته شده است. داده&amp;shy;های مورد نیاز از سرشماری&amp;shy;های 1385 و 1390 استخراج شده است. میزان عدالت توزیعی با استفاده از پرکاربردترین شاخص&amp;shy;های آماری در این زمینه یعنی منحنی لورنز و ضریب جینی از طریق نرم افزار &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;Excel&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; محاسبه شد. سطح&amp;shy;بندی استان&amp;shy;ها براساس مدل تحلیل عاملی، تاپسیس و تحلیل خوشه&amp;shy;ای انجام شد و در نهایت نقشه&amp;shy;های جغرافیایی میزان مزیت نسبی انواع گروه&amp;shy;های عمده شغلی در محیط نرم افزار &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span dir=&quot;LTR&quot;&gt;Arc GIS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;، در سطح کشور نیز ترسیم شد که قطعاً برای سیاست&amp;shy;گذاری مناسب در زمینه توسعه منطقه&amp;shy;ای ضروری است. نتایج تحقیق، نشان دهنده&amp;shy; شکاف زیاد بین نواحی روستایی استان&amp;shy;های کشور و توسعه&amp;shy;ی نامتعادل استان&amp;shy;ها با توجه به شاخص&amp;shy;های مورد استفاده است. براین اساس استان&amp;shy;های تهران، کرمانشاه، بوشهر و مازندران بالاترین امتیاز نسبی را کسب کردند و از امکانات بیشتری برای اشتغال&amp;shy;زایی در نواحی روستایی برخوردارند. در مقابل استان&amp;shy;های کرمان، سیستان و بلوچستان، کردستان و خوزستان از امتیازات نسبی پایین&amp;shy;تری برای اشتغال&amp;shy;زایی برخوردارند.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Introduction&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;Regarding the fact that economic activities, in particular, and resources and facilities, in general, are&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;poorly concentrated in terms of spatial distribution, every area requires a particular program&amp;nbsp;corresponding to its specific conditions. In this way, before doing everything we need to identify&amp;nbsp;the past and present situation of different regions based on appropriate scientific methods. The&amp;nbsp;inequality between urban and rural areas is mostly originated from the insufficient knowledge of&amp;nbsp;policies applied in these areas as well as policies taken to evaluate the impact of programs on&amp;nbsp;different economic variables including employment. In this article we are trying to recognize&amp;nbsp;deprived and non-deprived areas to help us study current status of employment in rural areas and&amp;nbsp;making a relative balance between all parts of the country. In fact we are going to find the answers&amp;nbsp;to the questions that: What are some comparative advantages of economic activity in rural areas?&amp;nbsp;What is Gini coefficient of economic activities in rural areas than in the country? According to the&amp;nbsp;comparative advantages of employment in the major occupational groups, how can we put different&amp;nbsp;provinces in order?&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Methodology&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;The aim of this article is to examine comparative advantages of rural areas in different provinces for&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;every major economic area and evaluating the amount of regional balance in every economic&amp;nbsp;section. This is an applied study accomplished by the use of descriptive- analytical method.&amp;nbsp;Required data has been taken from the census of 1385 and 1390 in Statistical Center of Iran. Along&amp;nbsp;with data processing and classification, employment status of major occupational groups in rural&amp;nbsp;areas has been accounted using Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient through Excel software.&amp;nbsp;Moreover, geographical maps of comparative advantage of a variety of major occupational groups&amp;nbsp;were drawn in ARC GIS software. Finally, rural population of different provinces was ranked based&amp;nbsp;on different groups of economic activities, through the models of Standard factor, Topsis, factor&amp;nbsp;analysis and clustering. The followings major occupational groups have been selected as Indicators&amp;nbsp;for determining comparative advantage and regional balance to calculate the amount of employment&amp;nbsp;in the provinces and rural areas.&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify; &quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;Discussion and conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle1&quot;&gt;We have selected 85 and 90 series as samples for the spatial analysis of the employment status in&amp;nbsp;rural areas. Then, we have tried some working indicators on this group and analyzed its results.&amp;nbsp;Results include some spatial patterns of working indicators in rural areas of Iran. In other words, it&amp;nbsp;shows that almost in all major occupational parts of the country, there is no regional balance in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;fontstyle0&quot;&gt;distribution of working population in rural areas: This type of inequality is more observable in the&amp;nbsp;two sections of &amp;quot;Hospitality and catering&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Real estate, renting and business activities&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;.&amp;quot;Agriculture&amp;quot; is the only section containing comparative balance within different provinces.&lt;br&gt;
Comparing Gini coefficient of rural population to the total number of employers of different&amp;nbsp;provinces in major occupational groups, it is understood that this indicator exceeds its total number&amp;nbsp;in rural areas and it&amp;#39;s still increasing. Only in &amp;quot;agriculture&amp;quot; sector of rural areas Gini coefficient is&amp;nbsp;less than its total which implies giving less attention to rural areas of the country and poor&amp;nbsp;investment in rural areas comparing to the rate of investment in the entire provinces over the recent&amp;nbsp;years.&lt;br&gt;
Studying comparative advantages of different provinces in major occupational groups in rural&amp;nbsp;population reveals the fact that there is a relatively observable advantage in 8 parts of Tehran&amp;nbsp;province. After Tehran, there are the two provinces of Mazandaran and Kermanshah in 5 and 4&amp;nbsp;parts, respectively, and then Yazd, Booshehr, and Kohgilouye and Boyer-Ahmed in 3 parts of&amp;nbsp;highly comparative advantages.&lt;br&gt;
Among the entire provinces, Tehran and Booshehr contains the least amount of comparative&amp;nbsp;advantage of employment only in &amp;quot;agriculture&amp;quot; sector.&lt;br&gt;
Some provinces including Kerman in all its occupational groups, Sistan- Baloochestan in 8 parts,&amp;nbsp;Kordestan in 5 parts, and Lorestan in 4 major occupational parts are among the deprived provinces&amp;nbsp;in terms of job creation in major occupational groups.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Based on the results of the study, despite of lots of experimental and theoretical studies on&amp;nbsp;geographical distribution of unemployment and regional employment which have been recently&amp;nbsp;doing by researchers, there is still some regional inequalities. It can be deduced that Gini coefficient&amp;nbsp;in rural areas has been rising from 1385 to 1390. In fact, regional differences of job creation are&amp;nbsp;increasing in rural areas. Studying comparative advantages of major occupational groups in rural&amp;nbsp;district of Tehran, Booshehr, Yazd, Esfahan, Khorasan-Razavi, Fars, Mazandaran, and Gilan shows&amp;nbsp;observable comparative advantage of employment in these areas. Although, there is an&amp;nbsp;inappropriate condition of employment in some provinces including Sistan-Baloochestan,&amp;nbsp;Hormozgan, and Kohgilouye Boyer-Ahmed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>توسعه منطقه ای, نواحی روستایی, گروه های شغلی, مزیت نسبی.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>regional development, rural areas, occupational groups, comparative advantage</keyword>
	<start_page>23</start_page>
	<end_page>50</end_page>
	<web_url>http://serd.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-15&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Aliakbar</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Anabestani</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>علی اکبر</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>عنابستانی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>me.javan65@gmail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846001792</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001792</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Associate prof., Geography &amp; Rural Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mehdi</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Javanshiri</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>مهدی</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>جوانشیری</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846001793</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846001793</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Ph.D. Student in Geography and rural Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran </affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
