Space Economy and Rural Development

Space Economy and Rural Development

A Comprehensive Framework in Sustainability Assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems

Authors
Shahpar Geravandi 1
Abdol Hamid Popzan 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Agriculture Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah. Iran.
2 Associate Prof, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran.
10.18869/acadpub.serd.5.15.1
Abstract
Introduction

Lack of a comprehensive framework is one of the most important challenges in sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems. This is the reason of tunnel vision in many researches in the field of sustainability. The history of Agricultural Exploitation Systems in Iran is back to thousands years ago, when ancient Iranian tried to domesticate wild animals and cereals in Iran. So, Agricultural Exploitation Systems are one of the fundamental issues in Iran’s agriculture section and these systems are of great importance in agricultural development of the country and even in urban development. Studies show that since very beginning, governments focused their attention on this system because of its potentials and capabilities such as production, job creation, and generating income and this caused major changes and development. According to the performed studies, there are different frameworks for sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems. Most of these frameworks consider the sustainability issue not holistically and try to investigate the sustainability issue just in economic, social and environmental dimensions. In these frameworks, some dimensions of sustainability are highlighted, while highlighting some dimensions is in contradiction to holistic view in sustainability assessment. Therefore, this study aims to introduce those
frameworks that are related to sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems and considers their inefficiencies and it also aims to introduce a comprehensive framework.

Methodology

By using a critical method, this qualitative and quantitative study tries to introduce a comprehensive framework to assess sustainability of Agricultural Exploitation Systems; By using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, this study gives weight to the existing criteria and sub-criterion in the recognized framework. To do so, two criteria were used for selecting the experts: First, recognized people have experiences in field studies in the case of Agricultural Exploitation Systems; they also have some documentary researches such as article, book an research projects. In this stage, different methods of sampling have been used including criterion-based sampling, snowball sampling and opportunistic sampling. Following that, participants were asked to perform pairwise comparisons in criteria and sub-criterion level; and to calculate fuzzy numbers in FAHP, Kong & Liu method has been used.

Discussion and Conclusion

Among four criteria that are effective in sustainability of Agricultural Exploitation Systems, management, capitals, vulnerability and tensions are the most important ones respectively. Based on experts’ comments, management issue is the most important criteria among all other criteria. In fact, management is a determinant factor in providing or not providing sustainability in the system; So, this is one of the most important issues is sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems that needs more consideration. Fuzzy comparison matrix and deriving weights of these criteria showed that social capacity as a sub-criterion in deriving weights is the most importance criteria. Capital is the second effective criteria in assessment of agricultural farming sustainability and it is rarely mentioned in other presented frameworks. Fuzzy ranking of various capitals showed that human capital is weighted as the most important capital. This finding confirms that development tools are not located in mountains, plains an under the ground but they must be investigated inside the human brain. Performing fuzzy comparisons in the case of tension as a sub-criterion showed that productivity is the most important criteria in determining Agricultural Exploitation Systems. Other sub-criterion are stability, compatibility, flexibility and reliability respectively. Deriving weights of subcriterion in the case of vulnerability showed that vulnerability in economic, social and environmental vulnerabilities are the most important criteria for sustainability assessmentof Agricultural Exploitation Systems. According to the obtained results, it is recommended to use the proposed framework and the derived weights as the standards for sustainability assessment of Agricultural Exploitation Systems.
Keywords
Agricultural Exploitation Systems
Sustainability
fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
- Adger, W. Neil, (2000), Social and ecological resilience: are they related?, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24 , no. 3 ,347-364 .
- Appeignen, B. & Klohn, W, (1999,. Management of water scarcity: a focus on social capacities and options. Phys. Chem, Earth. , vol. 24, no.4, 361-373. .
- Binder, Claudia. R., & Wiek, Arnim. F, (2007), The role of transdisciplinary processes in sustainability assessment of agricultural systems, In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), From common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 33–48). Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture.
- Chen,Yuh- Jen, Chen, Yuh-Min, Wang, Chin-Bin. & Chu, Hui-Chuan, (2007), Design and Implementation of a Cooperative Enterprise Selection Mechanism for Allied Concurrent Engineering Environment, Concurrent Engineering, vol 15, no 3, 257-273.
- Dimitris, Diakosawas, (2006), The development dimension coherence of agricultural and rural development policies, OECD publishing, 415 pp.
- Dutta, Venkatesh, (2012), Land Use Dynamics and Peri-urban Growth Characteristics: Reflections on Master Plan and Urban Suitability from a Sprawling North Indian City, Environment and Urbanization Asia, vol. 3, no. 2, 277-301.
- Eakin, Hallie, (2003), The social vulnerability of irrigated vegetable farming households in central Puebla, Journal of environmental & development, vol. 12 ,no. 4 ,414-429 .
- Erda, Lin, (1996), Agricultural vulnerability and adaptation to global warming in China, Water, air , and soil pollution, vol 92, issue 1, 63-73.
- Harun, Harun & Kamase, Haryono. P, (2012), Accounting Change and Institutional Capacity: The Case of a Provincial Government in Indonesia, Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, vol 6, no 2, 35-50.
- Harvey, Celia. A, Rakotobe, Zo, Lalaina, Rao, Nalini, S, Dave, Radhika, Razafimahatratra, Hasinandrianina, Rabarijohn, Haingo, & Mackinnon, James, K. (2014). Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar. Phil. Trans. R. SOC. B 369: 20130089.
- Hoanh, Chu Thai, Tuong, To Phuc, Gowing, John W & Hardy, Bill, (2006), Environment and livelihood in tropical coastal Zone: managing agriculture- fishery- aquaculture conflicts. 309 pp.
- Kaloxylos, Alexandros, Eigenmann, Robert, Tye, Frederick, Politopoulou, Zoi, Wolfert, Sjaak, Shrank, Claudia,. Dillinger, Markus, Lampropoulou, Ioanna, et al, (2012), Farm management systems and the future internet era. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, vol 89, 130-144.
- Kong, Feng, & Liu, Hongyan, (2005), Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of E-commerance, International Journal of information and systems sciences, vol 1, 406- 412.
- Kruezwizer, R, De loë, R, Imgrund, K, Conboy, M. J. & Simpson, H, (2011), Understanding stewardship behaviour factor facilitating and constraining private water well stewardship, Journal of Environmental Management, vol 92, 1104- 1114.
- Kuhlicke, Christian, Steinführer, Annett, Begg, Chloe, Bianchizza, Chiara, Bründl, Michael, Buchecker, Matthias, De Marchi, Bruna, Masso Tarditti, Marina Di, & et al, (2011), Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe, Environmental Science & Policy, vol 14, 804-814.
- Kuramoto, Juana, & Sagasti, Francisco, (2002), Integrating local and global knowledge, technology and production systems: challenges for technical cooperation, Science, Technology &Society, vol. 7 ,no. 2 ,215-247.
- Lin, Hsiu-Fen, Lee, Hsyan-shih & Wang, Da Wei, (2009), Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach, Journal of Information Science, vol. 35, no. 1, 25-44.
- Lindel, Michael. K. (2013). Disaster studies. Current Sociology Review. vol. 61 ,no. 5-6 ,797-825.
- Liukkonen, V., Virtanen, P., Mika Kivimäki., Pentti, J. & Vahtera. J, (2004), Social capital in working life and the health of employees. Journal of Social Science & Medicine, vol 59, 2447-2458.
- Lopez-Ridaura, S., Van Keulen, H., Van Ittersum, M. K. & Leffelaar, P. A, (2005), Multiscale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management system. Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol 7, 51-69.
- Marta-Costa, Ana Alexandra & Silva, Emiliana L. D. G, (2013), Methods and procedures for building sustainable farming systems: application in the European context, Springer science business media Dordrecht.
- Mauerhofer, Volker, (2013), Social capital, social capacity & social carrying capacity: perspectives for the social basics within environmental sustainability, Futures, vol 53, 63-73.
- Patton, Michael Quinn, (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2 nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif:sage publication.
- Pervanchon, Frank, (2007). When farmers integrate sustainable development in their strategy thank a tree: The sustainable farm tree. In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), From common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 111–120). Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture.
- Pretty, Jules, (2013), Agri-Culture: reconnecting people, land and nature, First Edition, Published by Taylor & Francis, 280pp.
- Pronyk, P. M, Harpham, T, Busza, J, Phetla, G., Morison, L. A., Hargreaves, J. R., Kim, J. C., Watts, Ch. H. & Porter, G. D, (2008), Can social capital be intentionally generated? A randomized trial from rural South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, vol 67, 1559-1570.
- Rao, N. H, & Rogers, P. P, (2006), Assessment of agricultural sustainability, Current science, vol 91, no 4, 439-448.
- Rigby, Dan, Woodhouse, Phil, Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, (2001), Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice, Journal of Ecological Economics., vol 39, no 3, 463- 478.
- Rizov, Marian, (2005), Human capital and the agrarian structure in transition: micro-evidence from Romania. Economic and Industrial Democracy, vol. 26 no, 1 119-149.
- Sandefur, Gary. D, Meier, Ann. M. & Campbell, Mary. E, (2006), Family resources, social capital, and college attendance, Journal of social science research, Vol 35, 525-553.
- Storeng, K. T, Drabo, S & Filippi, V, (2013), Too poor to live? A case study of vulnerability and maternal mortality in Burkina Faso, Global health promotion, vol 20, no 1, 33-38.
- Tao, Shengcai, Xu, Yinlong, Liu, Ke, Pan. Jie, & Gou, Shiwei, (2011), Research progress in agricultural vulnerability to climate change. Advances in climate change research, vol 2, Issue 4, 203-210.
- Thalmann, Christian & Grenz, Jan, (2013), Factor affecting the implementation of measures for improving sustainability on farms following the RISE sustainability evaluation. In A. A. Marta-Costa & E. Silva (Eds.), Method and procedures for building sustainable farming systems: application in the European Context. Springer science+ business media Dordrecht.
- Tow, Philip, Copper, Ian, Brich, Colin & Partidge, Larry, (2011), Rained farming systems, Springer Science & Business Media Publishing, 1354 pp
- Tsaur, Sheng-hshiung & Lin, Weri-rong, (2012), Selection Criteria of an Overseas Travel Intermediary for Group Package Tours: Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, vol 38, 283- 303.
- Wakhungu, Judi Wangalwa, (2001), Science, Technology, & public policy in africa: a framework for action, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol 21, no 4, 252-246.
- Woods, Michael., (2012), Rural geography :rural futures and the future of rural geography, Progress in Human Geography, vol 36, no 1, 134-125.
- Yadav, H. C, Jain, Rajeev ,Shukla, Sandarbh & Mishra, P. K. (2012), Prioritized aesthetic attributes of product: A fuzzy-AHP approach, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 4(4): 1281-1291.
- Zahm, Frédéric, Viaux, Philippe, Girardin, Philippe, Vilain, Lionel, & Mouchet, Christian, (2007), Farm sustainability assessment using the IDEA method. from the concept of farm sustainability to case studies on French farms, In F. Häni, L. Pintér, & H. Ferren (Eds.), From common principles to common practice. Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA) (pp. 77–110). Bern: INFASA and Swiss College of Agriculture.

  • Receive Date 08 June 2026
  • First Publish Date 08 June 2026